Mei Hasegawa vs Nalu Himeno Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 May at 05:24 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hasegawa vs N. Himeno

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hasegawa 1 - 0 Himeno
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mei Hasegawa winning 2 and Nalu Himeno winning 0. The last match between Mei Hasegawa and Nalu Himeno was at the W50 Kurume, 12-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Mei Hasegawa getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hasegawa | 1 |
| Himeno | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W50 Kurume(05-12-25)
M. Hasegawa vs N. Himeno H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 42.20% (46-63) | Career Total W/L | 20.59% (7-27) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hasegawa vs N. Himeno Match Preview:
- Both players show no recent performance on their second serve, with Hasegawa and Himeno each securing 0% of the points.
- When examining return game stats, neither Hasegawa nor Himeno have managed to win points on opponents' first or second serves in recent matches, making this a crucial area to examine.
- In high-pressure scenarios, particularly breakpoints, Hasegawa and Himeno have not saved any, suggesting vulnerabilities during pivotal match moments.
- Looking at match outcomes over the past year, Hasegawa has a 42.31% win rate, whereas Himeno trails with a 27.27% win rate. Does this suggest Hasegawa has a competitive edge?
- Surface preferences highlight Hasegawa's strength on indoor hard courts, achieving a 67% win rate, contrasting with Himeno's 31% win rate on hard surfaces.
- Regarding tournament levels, Hasegawa's 47.06% match win rate surpasses Himeno's 33.33%, indicating potential readiness for this competition level.
- Interestingly, comparison of opponent quality reveals Hasegawa has competed against lower-ranked players (average rank of 375.62), whereas Himeno has faced tougher opponents (average rank of 117.73).
- In terms of deciding set records, Himeno shows greater resilience with a 50% win rate compared to Hasegawa's 25%, which could be a factor if the match is tightly contested.
- Both players have yet to convert breakpoints recently, an area that could greatly influence the game's outcome if leveraged correctly.
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating recent performances, both Hasegawa and Himeno exhibit similar deficiencies in their second serve performance and return games. This presents an opportunity for the player who steps up their game to take advantage.
Hasegawa holds a competitive advantage with a higher win rate over the past year and a preference for indoor hard surfaces, which the match may feature. In comparison, Himeno tends to excel under pressure, particularly in deciding sets, evidenced by a superior win percentage in such scenarios.
Despite Hasegawa's advantage in match win percentages, the adversaries Himeno has faced were generally ranked higher, suggesting an ability to compete at a higher standard and a potential to surprise.
Considering all factors, although Hasegawa might appear to have a slight edge due to their historical win rates and preferred playing surface, the match remains open. Still, the prediction favors Hasegawa edging out as the likely winner, dependent on their ability to break through key statistics gaps.
Mei Hasegawa vs Nalu Himeno Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hasegawa vs N. Himeno H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:14:58 | Average Match Time | 1:14:58 |
| 71% (36/51) | 1st Serve % | 63% (33/52) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 60% (31/52) | Return Points Win % | 37% (19/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hasegawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 3-6 10-6 | ||
N. Himeno Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||

M. Hasegawa vs N. Himeno Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.20% (46/63) | YTD Win/Loss | 20.59% (7/27) |
| 46.12% (113/132) | Sets Win/Loss | 24.66% (18/55) |
| 49.54% (1133/1154) | Games Win/Loss | 36.78% (231/397) |
| 44.19% (38/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/12) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 319 | Total Double Faults | 37 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 369.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.29 |
| 66% (2624/3956) | 1st Serve % | 66% (467/707) |
| 57% (1498/2624) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (244/467) |
| 39% (517/1332) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (97/240) |
| 46% (240/517) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (36/75) |
| 45% (1911/4216) | Return Points Win % | 40% (290/718) |
| 40.48% (17/25) | Challenger W/L | 21.43% (3/11) |
| 43.28% (29/38) | Futures W/L | 20.00% (4/16) |
| 42% (44/106) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 21% (7/34) |
| 50% (8/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 23% (7/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 86% (50/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 70% (10/7) |
| 12% (50/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 30% (10/3) |
| 5% (59/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (24/0) |